13D Weekly Report - Jan 15, 2024 to Jan 19, 2024
$BJRI, $PENN, $TSP, $LL, $OPTT, $DIS, $PRKA
Table of contents
Fund 1 Investments Challenges BJ's Restaurants's (BJRI) Strategy, Urges Potential Sale
Mo Chen entered a Cooperation Agreement with TuSimple Holdings (TSP)
Trian Fund Nominates Candidates for Disney (DIS) Board
Allen Hartman Clashes with Silver Star Properties REIT Over Consent Solicitation
INITIATED
Fund 1 Investments Challenges BJ's Restaurants's (BJRI) Strategy, Urges Potential Sale
Key Summary: Fund 1 Investments filed SC 13D on Jan 18, 2024, citing undervalued shares, cost issues, and seeking strategic changes.Market Cap: $736 million | BJ's Restaurants, Inc. owns and operates casual dining restaurants in the United States.
On January 18, 2024, Fund 1 Investments (9.5%) stated that the shares are undervalued with potential for value maximization. They are skeptical of company's standalone strategy and unaddressed cost issues, prompting a Schedule 13D filing to push for strategic alternatives, including a potential sale. They plan to engage with the management and Board on operations, structure, and potential strategic transactions. Source
HG Vora Capital's Letter Expresses Concern Over Unequal Board Allocation at PENN Entertainment (PENN)
Key Summary: On Jan 12, 2024, HG Vora Capital (9.6%) voiced concern over unequal board allocation at the company, citing legal violations, demanding prompt rectification.Market Cap: $3.5 billion | PENN Entertainment, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides integrated entertainment, sports content, and casino gaming experiences in North America.
On January 12, 2024, HG Vora Capital Management (9.6%) issued a letter to the company expressing concern about the unequal allocation of members across the company's Board of Directors. HG Vora argues that this unequal allocation violates the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and the company's Articles of Incorporation, which require classes of directors to be as nearly equal in number as possible. HG Vora expects the company to rectify this violation promptly and reserves the right to take action to ensure compliance with the law and articles.
BOARD SEAT/ AGM RESULTS
Mo Chen entered a Cooperation Agreement with TuSimple Holdings (TSP)
Key Summary: On Jan 16, 2024, Mo Chen (19.1%), Executive Chairman, inked Cooperation Agreement with special committee for delisting Class A Common Stock. It amends Bylaws, requires 3+ independent directors, approval for Chen transactions. In 2-year Standstill Period, Chen supports independent directors, faces ownership limits, equitable Extraordinary Transactions.Market Cap: $87 million | TuSimple Holdings Inc., an autonomous technology company, develops autonomous technology specifically designed for semi-trucks in the United States and Asia-Pacific region.
On January 16, 2024, Mo Chen (19.1%), the Executive Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Company. This agreement, negotiated with a special committee of independent directors, pertains to the delisting and deregistration of the Company's Class A Common Stock. It mandates changes to the Company's Bylaws to ensure at least three independent directors and approval requirements for transactions involving Mr. Chen or Chen Affiliates. During the two-year Standstill Period, Mr. Chen commits to voting in favor of the Company's independent director nominees, while restrictions are placed on his ownership and participation in Extraordinary Transactions, ensuring equitable terms for Common Stock and other equity securities.
ONGOING
F9 Investments and John Jason Delves Retract Proposal to Acquire LL Flooring Holdings (LL) Amid Engagement Conditions
Key Summary: F9 and Delves (CTG) initially proposed to buy LL at $5.76/share, revoked due to LL's poor performance, then offered $3.00/share. On Jan 18, 2024, they withdrew the offer, citing restrictive engagement terms by LLMarket Cap: $93 million| LL Flooring Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard-surface flooring, and hard-surface flooring enhancements and accessories.
Background
On May 30, 2023, F9 Investments and John Jason Delves (CTG) (together 9.4%) stated that they are in the process of initiating contact with LL Management and Board with the intent of exploring a possible combination between LL and CTG. They believed such a combined entity will better position LL's financial and competitive standing. Source
On August 17, 2023, F9 Investments sent a letter to the CEO and Chairperson of the Board stating that due to the company's declining financial performance and decreasing value, the previously proposed offer to purchase all outstanding shares of the company at $5.76 per share, initially presented on May 26, 2023, and confirmed on June 9, 2023, is now being revoked.
On November 14, 2023, F9 Investments delivered a letter to the company which contained a non-binding proposal to acquire all of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company for all cash consideration valuing the Common Stock at $3.00 per share. Also, Mr. Sullivan nominated each of himself, Mr. Delves and Jill Witter for election to the Board at the 2024 AGM.
Update
On January 18, 2024, F9 Investments and John Jason Delves (together 8.8%) withdrew their offer to buy all LL shares at $3.00 each, initially proposed on November 14, 2023. This withdrawal was due to LL's precondition for engagement, which required agreements potentially limiting F9 and CTG's investment strategies in LL. Source
Paragon Technologies Challenges Ocean Power Technologies' (OPTT) Management and Strategy, Urges Shareholder Action
Key Summary: Paragon Technologies (3.9%) has raised concerns about Ocean Technologies' financials and initiated legal action following the company's declaration of their nomination letter as invalid. Despite Paragon continuing to seek votes for its nominees, the company has urged shareholders to ignore the nomination letter, stating that such votes will not be counted.Market Cap: $18 million | Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. develops and commercializes proprietary systems that generate electricity by harnessing the renewable energy of ocean waves in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia..
Background
On July 7, 2023, Paragon Technologies (3.9%) provided a letter to the stockholders with respect to its views regarding the Company’s financial condition and the performance of the board. It expressed its concerns about the company's ongoing cash burn and lack of a coherent plan for profitability. It highlighted the company's history of net losses since its inception in 1994, declining share price, failed commercialization efforts, and high operating expenses. Paragon intends to provide a slate of director nominees with the aim of reducing losses, addressing the cash burn, and implementing a go-to-market strategy to create profitable operations at the company.
On July 14, 2023, Paragon Technologies (4%) expressed its concerns about alleged wrongdoing and mismanagement by the board and management. It has requested access to the company's records and will pursue litigation if the board does not comply. Furthermore, it stated that it may make binding or non-binding stockholder proposals or may nominate one or more individuals as nominees for election to the board. Source
On July 17, 2023, Paragon sent an Inspection Demand to the company, requesting access to the company's books and records for the purpose of investigating apparent wrongdoing and/or mismanagement by the Board and/or management. Source
On July 27, 2023, Paragon filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery to enforce for inspecting Company's books and records.
On August 2, 2023, Paragon Technologies, Inc. issued a press release regarding the company, demanding clear explanations from the board on how the company will fund operations beyond July 31, 2024.
On August 11, 2023, Paragon Technologies (4%) calls on the company to REFRAIN from ALL future equity share sales that will dilute shareholders and immediately announce a significant cost cutting plan to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to protecting shareholder value. Source
On August 25, 2023, Paragon demands corporate governance adherence and shareholder value enhancement, urging to:
Reinstate the Company’s bylaws to their original form prior to Paragon’s calling out the Company’s worsening financial performance
Terminate the Company’s poison pill and grant Paragon its limited waiver
Allow Paragon, as is Paragon’s right as a shareholder, to examine the Company’s books and records
Reconstitute its Board to appoint Paragon’s directors to the Company’s Board. Source
On August 25, 2023, Paragon Technologies notified its intent to nominate five directors for the company's board at the 2023 annual meeting. On August 29, 2023, Paragon Technologies submitted a second request for an exemption related to the "Section 382 Tax Benefits Preservation Plan" adopted by the company's board on June 29, 2023, limiting ownership to 19.9% of the company's outstanding shares. The company's board has not responded to these exemption requests. Source
On October 9, 2023, Paragon Technologies stated that it has initiated legal action against the board and CEO for alleged breach of fiduciary duties. They sought to appoint three directors to the board and requested an exemption from poison pill provision. Paragon criticized the management for self-serving actions and misleading statements. Source
On October 20, 2023, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in favor of Paragon Technologies (OTC PINK:PGNT), ordering Ocean Power Technologies (OPT) to provide Paragon with certain books and records for an investigation. Paragon had made a books and records demand on July 17, 2023, which OPT initially refused, leading to litigation. During the trial, Paragon raised concerns about OPT's financial losses, expenses, and director/officer compensation, as well as actions by OPT's board seemingly aimed at interfering with Paragon's efforts to elect new directors. The Court found that Paragon had a credible basis to suspect wrongdoing and rejected OPT's claim of an improper motive for the demand. Sham Gad, Chairman of Paragon, expressed satisfaction with the decision and urged OPT to work constructively with shareholders. Source
On October 24, 2023, Paragon Technologies sent a letter to the independent directors of the company, raising concerns about recent decisions made by the board. The letter questioned whether the actions taken by the directors are in the best interest of shareholders and suggests that these actions may be aimed at preventing certain director candidates from being presented to shareholders. Paragon highlights several actions, including the adoption of new by-laws, the implementation of a poison pill, engagement of multiple law firms and a proxy defence firm, and the refusal to provide access to company records. Paragon calls for transparency and questions the board's spending decisions in light of OPT's financial situation.
On November 13, 2023, Paragon Technologies notified the Company that Robert J. Tannor notified them of his withdrawal as a nominee, due to health reasons that he is still recovering from, for election to the Company’s board of directors at the Company’s 2023 AGM. Paragon Technologies intends to proceed to nominate the four other candidates previously notified to the Company. Source
On November 17, 2023, a Delaware Chancery Court ruling and evidence suggest a gap between OPT's public statements and financial reality. Paragon calls on OPT to implement a substantial cost-cutting plan and cease issuing equity to safeguard shareholder interests. Source
On November 28, 2023, Paragon Technologies filed proxy materials seeking support for its nominees.
On November 30, 2023, the Delaware Court of Chancery denied Paragon's request for injunctive relief filed on October 9, 2023. As a result, Paragon's nominations and exemption request remain rejected, and they cannot nominate their candidates for the OPT Board at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Source
On December 4, 2023, Paragon Technologies stated that it intends to move forward with its election contest at the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of shareholders (scheduled by the Company to be held on January 31, 2024) and intends to nominate its four director candidates at the annual meeting. Source
On December 11, 2023, Paragon Technologies reiterated its concerns and urges shareholders to vote for its nominees. Source
On December 18, 2023, Paragon Technologies reiterated its concerns and urges shareholders to vote for its nominees. Source
On December 21, 2023, the company announced shareholders may receive materials from Paragon Technologies but advised discarding them, as votes for Paragon's nominees on the blue proxy card will not be counted
On December 29, 2023, Paragon Technologies reiterated its concerns and urges shareholders to vote for its nominees. Source
On January 4, 2024, Paragon Technologies, Inc. reminded shareholders to DISREGARD any WHITE proxy from OPT and issued a presentation on how to vote the BLUE proxy card.
Valuation insight
Paragon believes OPT could be worth +$3 a share, or 10x return, with an improved operating cost structure, disciplined capital allocation, and a realigned focus on potential growth of Marine Advanced Robotics.
On January 15, 2024, Paragon Technologies issued a presentation reiterating its concerns and reminded shareholders to vote for its nominees.
Update
On January 18, 2024, Paragon Technologies (4.8%) challenged OPT's CEO, Phillip Stratmann, over his conflicting statements regarding OPT's profitability in 2025. Stratmann had claimed OPT would be profitable using current capital, but Paragon pointed out discrepancies between this and OPT's EBITDA breakeven projection, questioning the lack of a clear cost-cutting strategy. Paragon criticized Stratmann's management, noting OPT's ceased R&D disclosures since he became CEO and escalating expenses. They accused OPT's Board of self-serving actions and misleading shareholders, failing to commercialize products or present a viable strategy. Paragon urged shareholders to vote using their BLUE proxy card for change and transparency in OPT's management and strategy. Source
Trian Fund Nominates Candidates for Disney (DIS) Board
Key Summary: On Jan 18, 2024, Trian Fund filed proxy materials seeking support for its nominees and proposals. On Jan 3, 2024, Blackwells nominated 3 board candidates against Trian Fund.Market Cap: $168 billion | The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries, operates as an entertainment company worldwide.
Background
Blackwells Capital
On January 3, 2024, Blackwells Capital nominated three candidates for Disney's board of directors, opposing Trian Fund Management's efforts. Blackwells believed that Trian's campaign was disconnected from Disney stakeholders' needs and driven by personal animus. They also expressed concerns about Trian's association with Ancora Holdings Group, requesting a Disney Board investigation. They argued that their candidates complemented Disney's current leadership better than Trian's nominees. Source
Trian Fund
On January 12, 2023, Trian Fund filed proxy materials for the election of Nelson Peltz, its CEO and Founding Partner, to the Board at 2023 AGM. Trian believes that Disney’s recent performance reflects the hard truth that it is a company in crisis with many challenges weighing on investor sentiment. While we acknowledge that Disney, like many media companies, is undergoing a challenging pivot to streaming, Disney also benefits from owning best-in-class intellectual property, a more diversified business mix, and a Parks business that is enjoying all-time high profitability. As such, we believe that the Company’s current problems are primarily self-inflicted and need to be addressed immediately, including poor corporate governance, prro strategy and operations and poor capital allocation. Source
On January 27, 2023, Trian Fund filed proxy materials seeking support for its nominees.
On February 2, 2023, Trian Fund issued a press release and a letter to shareholders related to the company, which Trian also simultaneously published to its website, located at www.RestoreTheMagic.com
On February 9, 2023, Trian Fund congratulated the company on its recently announced operating initiatives, which are a win for all shareholders and broadly align with Trian’s thinking, and, pursuant to which, Trian announced it is withdrawing its nomination of Nelson Peltz to the board of directors of the Company. Source
On November 30, 2023, Trian Fund stated that it had discussions with Disney's CEO and was offered a meeting with the Board. However, Disney declined Trian's request for Board representation, including Nelson Peltz. Trian expressed disappointment in Disney's performance, citing a loss of around $70 billion in shareholder value since February and underperformance compared to peers and the broader market over the last decade. They believe the recent additions to the Board will not restore investor confidence, and Trian intends to present its case for change directly to shareholders. Source
On December 14, 2023, Trian Fund statd that it intends to nominate two independent director candidates for the Board at the 2024 AGM. Trian believes that Disney has underperformed its potential, with lower earnings per share (EPS) despite significant capital investment and lagging margins in its businesses. Source
Update
On January 18, 2024, Trian Fund filed proxy materials soliciting votes for several matters, including the election of Nelson Peltz and James (“Jay”) A. Rasulo as directors for one year (Proposal 1), ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for fiscal 2024 (Proposal 2), an advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3), approval of an amendment to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4), consideration of shareholder proposals on excessive golden parachutes (Proposal 5) and political expenditures (Proposal 6), approval of a resolution repealing certain Bylaws provisions (Proposal 7), and an advisory vote on board size and related vacancies (Proposal 8). Source
Focused Compounding Calls for Special Shareholder Meeting and Proposes Significant Bylaw Revisions at Parks! America, Inc (PRKA)
Key Summary: In January 2020, Focused Compounding disclosed a 17.01% stake and requested discussions. In December 2023, they demanded a special shareholder meeting.Market Cap: $31 million | Parks! America, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in acquiring, developing, and operating local and regional theme parks and attractions in the United States.
Focused Compounding Fund
Background
On January 28, 2020, Focused Compounding Fund disclosed 17.01% and sent a letter to the Board seeking discussions with the management, Board and representatives of the company.
On December 22, 2023, Focused Compounding (38.5%) demanded a special shareholder meeting from the Company. The meeting will address five proposals: (i) Repealing certain provisions of the Bylaws to restore them to their 2012 form if amended before the proxy solicitation is complete, (ii) Removing all seven members of the Board as per Section 4.9(a) of the Bylaws, (iii) Amending Section 4.7 of the Bylaws regarding vacancies on the Board, (iv) Electing new Board members, Andrew Kuhn, Geoff Gannon, and James Ford, and (v) Authorizing Focused Compounding Fund to adjourn the meeting if needed for the proposed changes. Source
On January 4, 2024, Focused Compounding filed proxy materials seeking support for its nominees.
Update
On January 18, 2024, Focused Compounding sent a letter to the Board insisting on holding a special election, criticizing the Board's legal maneuvers and reliance on Nevada law to maintain their positions. It accused the Board of avoiding direct shareholder communication and instead using legal strategies to remain in power. The letter emphasized the importance of democratic engagement and challenged the Board to run a genuine campaign to win over shareholders. It criticized the Board's lack of honor and integrity, questioning their reliance on technicalities rather than shareholder interests.
Past
Nicholas A. Parks
On January 30, 2019, Nicholas A. Parks (12.06%) entered into discussions with a private equity firm to discuss strategic options involving the company’s stock. Mr. Parks stated that he wishes to continue such discussions in hopes of the following:
To purchase additional shares of the outstanding stock.
To have an active role in company decisions in order to maximize shareholder value.
On September 23, 2019, Nicholas A. Parks (6.28%) stated that he believes the company should, acquire a scalable business in order to grow the company’s revenue over time. If unable to identify appropriate acquisitions, to return capital to shareholders via a special dividend or by purchasing its own stock Source
On January 28, 2020, Nicholas A. Parks entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Focused Compounding Fund, LP for the sale of 4,110,000 shares of Common Stock. As a result of the closing of the transactions, Nicholas A. Parks beneficially own approximately 2.00% of the outstanding Common Stock. Source
Marlton Wayne
On December 17, 2018, Marlton Wayne (5.04%) sent a letter to the Board noting its concerns that the company’s public equity trades below its intrinsic value and offering potential solutions to substantially increase stockholder value. In the letter, Marlton outlined a proposed change in capital allocation and corporate governance that they believe is needed to put the company on a path that will reward stockholders:
Return of capital of $1,500,000 through either a Special Dividend of $0.0201 per share representing 13.8% of the market capitalization based on the current share price of $0.1451 or a Modified Dutch Auction Tender.
Forming a Special Committee of Independent Board Members to explore all strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value, including the disbursement of a Special Dividend, Modified Dutch Auction Tender and/or the sale of the company.
On January 14, 2019, Marlton Wayne (5.04%) sent a letter reiterating its concerns that the company’s current capital allocation strategy and corporate governance are causing the company’s equity to trade at a significant discount. to the Board.
On July 22, 2019, Marlton Wayne (5.04%) delivered a letter to the company demanding the inspection of certain of the company’s books and records
Allen Hartman Clashes with Silver Star Properties REIT Over Consent Solicitation
Key Summary: In Oct 2023, Allen R. Hartman advocated for Silver Star's liquidation and criticized mismanagement, leading to legal disputes regarding annual meetings. In Dec 2023, Hartman was sued by Silver Star for alleged misconduct. In Jan 2024, the company is conducting a Consent Solicitation to re-elect directors, which Hartman opposes, citing board actions that thwart stockholder choices and violate the company's charter.Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. is a self-managed real estate investment trust that is currently repositioning in an orderly manner into the self storage asset class.
Background
On October 17, 2023, Allen R. Hartman (15%) expressed his belief that Silver Star should pursue a liquidation strategy and return capital to investors due to perceived mismanagement. He argued that most stockholders would prefer their capital returned in a Texas commercial property REIT rather than risking it in a national self-storage strategy. Mr. Hartman attributed Silver Star's declining value to mismanagement by the Executive Committee, led by Gerald Haddock. He accused Silver Star of adopting a short-term liquidation approach with asset sales at discounted prices and overinvestment in self-storage ventures at high costs to investors. Silver Star hadn't held an annual stockholder meeting since 2013, leading Mr. Hartman to file a lawsuit for a 2023 meeting. In response, Silver Star changed its Bylaws to allow stockholders to act without a meeting, a move contested by Mr. Hartman as violating Maryland law. Additionally, he and vREIT requested access to Silver Star's stock ledger, which was denied, claiming a lack of a "legitimate purpose." Source
On October 19, 2023, Mr. Hartman and vREIT filed a First Amended Complaint in the Maryland Litigation to compel a 2023 annual meeting, inspect the stock ledger, and declare the Purported Bylaw Amendment unlawful. Source
On December 14, 2023, Allen R. Hartman issued a press release disclosing that he object to the ongoing consent solicitation and that he is going to vote “NO” to the proposal in the Consent Solicitation for the re-election of Jack I. Tompkins, Gerald W. Haddock and James S. Still to the Board.
On December 14, 2023, Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. initiated legal proceedings against Allen R. Hartman and related parties, alleging multiple charges including fraud, conspiracy, slander of title, and breach of contract. The company contends that the Hartman Defendants engaged in self-dealing, misused company resources, breached fiduciary duties, and conducted fraudulent litigation, resulting in substantial damages. These legal actions seek to address the alleged misconduct and facilitate the recovery of damages. Source Top of Form
On January 8, 2024, Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. stated that it is conducting a Consent Solicitation to re-elect incumbent directors while seeking to reduce the board's size, effectively removing Allen Hartman. Hartman, the largest stockholder, strongly opposes the re-election, alleging that the board is avoiding an annual meeting, violating the company's charter, and preventing meaningful stockholder choices. Source
Silver Star has not held an annual meeting of stockholders in a number of years. The Entrenched Directors have blocked all of Hartman’s efforts to hold an annual meeting where stockholders could have a choice between re-electing the Entrenched Directors versus an alternative slate that has a different vision of the Company. This summer, Hartman reminded the Company of its obligations under law and its charter to hold an annual meeting for the purpose of electing directors and asked when one would be scheduled. Rather than schedule a meeting, the Board enacted a bylaw amendment in an attempt to avoid an annual meeting where stockholders would have a choice, and instead the bylaw amendment would permit directors to be elected by stockholder consent obtained through a consent solicitation. The Hartman Group believes the bylaw amendment was made in bad faith by the Entrenched Directors, is a blatant manipulation of the corporate machinery by them to remain in office, and violates Silver Star’s charter and Maryland law. Hartman has been forced to resort to litigation, and has in fact sued the Company and the Entrenched Directors to declare the bylaw amendment invalid and to compel an annual meeting.
On January 12, 2024, Allen Hartman and the Hartman Group sent an email to the shareholders, expressing frustration with the current Board and advocating for the liquidation of the company instead of pursuing a self-storage strategy. They proposed a new board focused on selling properties, paying down debt, and returning capital to shareholders. They cited an estimated conservative value of $8.00 per share and urged investors to revoke their consent solicitation votes to push for liquidation. Source
Update
On January 18, 2024, Allen Hartman and the Hartman Group sent a letter to the shareholders countering Haddock's (CEO of the company)claims and the ongoing Consent Solicitation. Hartman denied using the company for personal gain, unlike Haddock, who took fees and awarded himself convertible units. He criticized Haddock's lack of experience and mismanagement, leading to poor company performance and auditor issues. Hartman emphasized the need for liquidation as per the company's charter, opposing the Board's new strategy. He called for a shareholder meeting to decide on asset sales and capital return, urging shareholders to revoke consent to the Board's current plans.